WHY FILINK
Why Filink
Compare Other Companies
Video Clip
Business Status
Compare Other Companies WHY FILINK > Compare Other Companies    Share

Comparing Specification

Comparing IR Cut Growth in last 5 years

FILINK FILM

1. Filink is proud of Inorganic Convergence Film that is made by the best nano dispersion technology.
2. Nano Ceramic film is not allowed dyed or metallic material which cause fading or oxidation of the film.
   That’s why ceramic film has better durability.
3. Ceramic film does not cover only specific period (900~1000nm), it is also covered whole infrared ray (781~2500nm)
   to maximize heat protection.
4. It has lower reflection than Metalized film, so ceramic film provides better visibility.
5. Optical PET Film which has better transparency and Optical coating solution is applied to maximize visibility and clarity.
6. It has high VLT as well as keeping High TSER (Total Solar Energy Rejection.
7. Inorganic Convergence film doesn’t have signal interference not like metalized film.
8. Ceramic film that is not allow dye, or metallic material is available to use over 15 years.
9. Multi-layer structure prevents damage from shattered glass. 

Comparing performance data with competitors

HEAT H70
ITEM FILINK
(HEAT H70)
A
(Ceramic)
B C
Visible Light Transmittance (V L T) 49% 52% 49% 50%
Visible Light
Reflectance
Interior 12% 12% 12% 10%
exterior 11% 14% 12%
Total Solar Transmittance
(T S T)
30% 38% 44% 65%
Total Solar Energy Transmittance
(T S E R)
54% 50% 42% 47%
HEAT R50
ITEM FILINK
(HEAT R50)
A
(VLT 50%)
B
(VLT 75%)
C
(VLT 50%)
Visible Light Transmittance (V L T) 48% 52% 75% 53%
Visible Light
Reflectance
Interior 6.8% 12% 12% 10%
exterior 6.4% 12%
Total Solar Transmittance
(T S T)
26.7% 38% 60% 65%
Total Solar Energy Transmittance
(T S E R)
56% 50% 39% 47%
HEAT R60
ITEM FILINK
(HEAT R60)
A
(VLT 50%)
B
(VLT 75%)
C
(VLT 50%)
Visible Light Transmittance (V L T) 61% 52% 75% 50%
Visible Light
Reflectance
Interior 6.6% 12% 12% 7%
exterior 6.7% 8%
Total Solar Transmittance
(T S T)
26.7% 38% 60% -
Total Solar Energy Transmittance
(T S E R)
54% 50% 39% 56%
ICE H95
COMPANY ITEM VLT VLR(Ex) VLR(In) TST TSER SC U-Value Comments
FILINK ICE H95 46 14 17 25 59 0.53 5.5 Lower VLR, SC, TST and U-Value with Higher TSER
A A-35 36 19 13 35 56 0.52 5.3 Lower VLT
A-45 47 9 8 47 41 0.69 5.7 Higher SC
A-35(SR) 36 47 28 20 75 0.28 3.4 Higher SC
B B-50 50 7 7 - 56 0.5 5.8 Higher U-Value(Most expensive Item in B Company)
B-40 44 14 12 - 53 0.54 6.02 Higher U-Value
B-35 36 13 7 - 52 0.55 6.02 Higher U-Value and lower VLT
B-50(Ni) 50 24 23 - 56 0.5 5.4 Higher VLR
B-50(PR) 50 8 7 - 56 0.5 5.8 Higher U-Value
C C-50 51 24 27 35 57 0.5 4.45 Higher VLR
C-50(Bronze) 45 23 21 29 62 0.45 5.5 Higher VLR
C-40 38 14 10 38 51 0.57 5.64 Lower TSER
D D-70(06) 75 12 - 60 39 0.69 4.2 Lower TSER / Higher SC / Costly / Max Width: 1,250mm
D-60(05) 65 21 - 45 50 0.57 4.1 Lower TSER / Higher SC / Costly / Max Width: 1,250mm
개인정보취급방침|이용약관 회원가입 | 로그인